On 4/22/20 11:58 AM, John Covici wrote: > > Yes, portage agrees with that statement, maybe I didn't give you the > whole log, I thought it said that in there -- I did see that, I am > sure. My question is how does this work normally, when you merge a > package and update is this not always the case that there are files > owned by the previous version on the system? >
Yeah, but the package manager knows which files are owned by the version being replaced and it doesn't complain about those.
