On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 02:10:54PM -0400, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 12:58 PM Consus <con...@ftml.net> wrote:
> >
> > even distribution kernel is not an
> > official thing, but a desperate attempt of someone to fix things.
> >
> 
> Huh?  gentoo-sources is in at least as good a shape as I've ever seen
> it.  I'd argue it is in better shape than at a lot of times in the
> past.

Still you have to manually configure things. And I know that Gentoo is
about choice, but configuring kernel is hard.
 
> There are other kernels in the repo, as there have been for as long as
> I can remember.   They vary in purpose and level of QA.  And of course
> you can just download your own sources considering the official
> handbook instructions has you build your own kernel anyway...  I
> personally just run upstream longterm so that I have more control over
> things, because I run ZFS.  However I wouldn't say that this is any
> problem with the Gentoo kernels - I just have unusual needs and a
> package for the source tarball doesn't really add much value anyway.
> A package that actually builds/installs a working kernel seems like a
> lot more value-add aside from the QA.

That's why I love gentoo-kernel-bin. It provides a decent kernel without
any "oh crap oh crap oh crap what should I do with all these new
options".

P.S. genkernel seems to be actively maintained again, neat.

Reply via email to