On 2020-02-11 00:06, Rich Freeman wrote:
Nevertheless, thank you for discussing it with me
You're welcome. You're hardly the first person to disagree with me.
:)
I'm also not in any particular position of power when it comes to how
bugs are handled. You can always make a proposal to automatically
close old bugs. I'd probably start with the Bug Wranglers, though you
could always bring an issue to the Council if you don't feel you're
getting the desired response there. They've certainly been known to
disagree with me at times too. :)
Interesting discussion. To bad that it's over. Not so much from the
technical site, but the different POV's. Michael tries to improve
things, make things better. Rich stays with the common 'it is like it is
and it is good'. An example to the big view:
https://web.archive.org/web/20080331092730/http://www.linux.com/articles/60124
Even if I tend to Michael's side, I don't say Rich is wrong. To me the
truth is in the middle, always.
--
Sent with eQmail-1.10.3 beta - a fork of djb's famous qmail
