200206 Ian Zimmerman wrote: > On 2020-02-06 09:56, Mick wrote: >> Otherwise the latest sci-libs/lapack is 3.8.0, > so your links above look correct as far as I can tell. > Note that sci-libs/lapack and sci-libs/lapack-reference > are 2 distinct packages. The OP presumably has the latter. > Both of them existing may be the real bug here.
FWIW my own set-up seems to support that. 872: ~> ls -l /usr/lib64/liblapack.* lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 14 Nov 16 17:11 /usr/lib64/liblapack.so -> liblapack.so.3 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 18 Nov 16 17:11 /usr/lib64/liblapack.so.3 -> liblapack.so.3.8.0 -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 6637008 Nov 16 17:11 /usr/lib64/liblapack.so.3.8.0 873: ~> When I checked earlier today, there were broken symlinks to lapack-reference , but deleting them made no difference : the pkg isn't installed. Octave opens & calculates '1+1' without any problems. So the solution to the OP's problem mb simply to unmerge lapack-reference . -- ========================,,============================================ SUPPORT ___________//___, Philip Webb ELECTRIC /] [] [] [] [] []| Cities Centre, University of Toronto TRANSIT `-O----------O---' purslowatchassdotutorontodotca
