On Wed, 19 Jun 2019 14:26:50 -0400, Jack wrote:

> On 2019.06.19 14:10, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> > On Wed, 19 Jun 2019 20:45:03 +0800, Bill Kenworthy wrote:
> >   
> > > wifi ~ # unsymlink-lib --analyze
> > > /usr/lib needs to be a symlink to lib64!
> > > wifi ~ # ls -al /usr/lib
> > > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 10 JanĀ  4 13:37 /usr/lib -> /usr/lib64
> > > wifi ~ #
> > >
> > > The symlink looks the same as another unconverted system - so
> > > whats    
> > the  
> > > problem?  
> > 
> > On this system, /usr/lib is a symlink to lib64, as the message states,
> > not /usr/lib64
> > 
> > % ls -ld /usr/lib
> > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 5 Jul 16  2015 /usr/lib -> lib64

> Ah, I think we've gotten to a bad splitting of hairs.  /usr/lib ->  
> lib64 and /usr/lib -> /usr/lib64 have the same effect, but are not  
> quite the same.  The first is a relative symlink, the second is  
> absolute, although both actually point to the same place.

That's what software does, it interprets things literally. It is looking
for a symlink to lib64 and finding something else. The fact that the
actual link is equivalent is also irrelevant.


-- 
Neil Bothwick

The severity of the itch is inversely proportional to the reach.

Attachment: pgptMvQSPJOu7.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to