În ziua de joi, 9 august 2018, la 11:37:38 EEST, Neil Bothwick a scris: > I agree with all of this and I would also add Duplicity as a possible > candidate, although not quite as simple to use as BorgBackup (I haven't > tried Dirvish) I usually end up putting a wrapper script around such tasks > anyway.
I've been using Duplicity in production for a few years. I find its features quite better than borgbackup. However, it has one very annoying design problem: the local cache. In my case, doing daily backups for two years for ~200GB of data requires a growing and growing local cache. It's 50GB as of now. You delete the cache and it comes back when doing the next incremental backup.
