On Monday, 23 April 2018 11:57:27 BST Mick wrote: > On Monday, 23 April 2018 10:52:57 BST Peter Humphrey wrote: > > On Sunday, 22 April 2018 12:13:53 BST Mick wrote: > > > On Sunday, 22 April 2018 10:21:16 BST Peter Humphrey wrote: > > > > That first thought was prompted by the instruction to "mount -o bind > > > > /lib/ > > > > modules /foo/lib/modules" in this page: > > > > > > > > https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:X86/Chroot_Guide > > > > > > I didn't do a detailed comparison, but you may want to take a look at > > > the > > > Handbook, the chroot mounts appear to be different. > > > > I think I've found the problem. It's in the -march setting, which of > > course > > has to be specific in the chroot, not "native." I had it set to > > "silvermont," but now I can't see why I did that. The target CPU is a > > celeron N3150, which according to an Intel site is "Products formerly > > Braswell" [1]. None of the Gentoo or GCC optimisation sites I could find > > even mention braswell, silvermont or model 76. > > If you check 'man gcc' you will find "silvermont" is mentioned as a cpu_type > you could set for march, but not the graphics core Braswell.
Yes, so it is, but I couldn't tell which arch I needed for this CPU. Thanks to you both. -- Regards, Peter.
