On 2018-03-16, the...@sys-concept.com <the...@sys-concept.com> wrote: > On 03/15/2018 11:04 PM, J. Roeleveld wrote:
>>> Instead of removing pdftk from the portage tree because it depends on >>> gcc-5.4 [gcj], is there any reason it can't be replace by the one >>> which uses a jvm instead? >> >> Someone needs to maintain it as well. > > From the "pdftk-9999 --help" > -----quote---------- > AUTHOR > Sid Steward (sid.steward at pdflabs dot com) maintains pdftk. Please > email him with questions or bug reports. Include pdftk in the > subject > line to ensure successful delivery. Thank you. > -----end quote------- Sid Steward is the "maintainer" of the original Java/C++ version of pdftk that lives at https://www.pdflabs.com/tools/pdftk-the-pdf-toolkit/. The last change was almost 5 years ago, so I think it's safe to assume it's been abandoned. What needs maintaining for the new ebuild is 1) The new java-only upstream version of pdftk that lives at https://gitlab.com/marcvinyals/pdftk/ 2) The ebuild itself -- Grant Edwards grant.b.edwards Yow! Somewhere in Tenafly, at New Jersey, a chiropractor gmail.com is viewing "Leave it to Beaver"!
