On Wed, Dec 06, 2017 at 06:35:10PM -0500, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 6:28 PM, Frank Steinmetzger <war...@gmx.de> wrote:
> >
> > I don’t really care about performance. It’s a simple media archive powered
> > by the cheapest Haswell Celeron I could get (with 16 Gigs of ECC RAM though
> > ^^). Sorry if I more or less stole the thread, but this is almost the same
> > topic. I could use a nudge in either direction. My workplace’s storage
> > comprises many 2× mirrors, but I am not a company and I am capped at four
> > bays.
> >
> > So, Do you have any input for me before I fetch the dice?
> >
> 
> IMO the cost savings for parity RAID trumps everything unless money
> just isn't a factor.

Cost saving compared to what? In my four-bay-scenario, mirror and raidz2
yield the same available space (I hope so).

-- 
Gruß | Greetings | Qapla’
Please do not share anything from, with or about me on any social network.

Advanced mathematics have the advantage that you can err more accurately.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to