On 11/01 04:44, tu...@posteo.de wrote:
> On 11/01 04:05, David Haller wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > On Wed, 01 Nov 2017, tu...@posteo.de wrote:
> > [..]
> > >Thanks a lot for the extensive help, SIR! :)
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > [..]
> > >The patch itself was found (so the local thing works fine) and failed.
> > >
> > >The *.patch.out is attached to the email and after looking into it I
> > >think you will find the problem a hundred years faster than me since
> > >you created it. It seems some files are not where they are supposed to
> > >be.
> >
> > Not quite. The "not founds" are normal for epatch/eapply trying
> > various '-p' levels... But see below in the patch.out (and nice that
> > you supplied that right away).
> >
> > >There is a glitch in the matrix...they have changed something...I
> > >see Schroedingers cat twice.
> > >
> > >Ah! By the way: According to quantum physics the cite at the bottom of
> > >you previous email is wrong :
> > >"WANTED: Schroedingers Cat, dead or alive."
> > >must be
> > >"WANTED: Schroedingers Cat, dead and alive."
> > >Heisenberg would not accept this kind of uncertainty -- in
> > >principle...
> > >;)
> >
> > *g* You're right. But it's just a quote I picked up long time ago ;)
> >
> > Anyway, here's the deal:
> >
> > [..]
> > >PATCH COMMAND: patch -p1 -g0 -E --no-backup-if-mismatch --dry-run -f <
> > >'/var/tmp/portage/media-gfx/structure-synth-1.5.0-r1/files/structure-synth-1.5.0-gl.patch'
> > >
> > >==========================================
> > >checking file SyntopiaCore/GLEngine/Raytracer/Sampler.h
> > >Hunk #1 FAILED at 1 (different line endings).
> > >1 out of 1 hunk FAILED
> > >checking file SyntopiaCore/GLEngine/Raytracer/VoxelStepper.cpp
> > >Hunk #1 FAILED at 122 (different line endings).
> > >1 out of 1 hunk FAILED
> > >checking file SyntopiaCore/GLEngine/Sphere.h
> > >Hunk #1 FAILED at 1 (different line endings).
> > >1 out of 1 hunk FAILED
> > >
> > >patch program exited with status 1
> > >==========================================
> >
> > Because this failed, epatch goes on, confusing you with more a few
> > more 'not found' stuff outputs...
> >
> > >PATCH COMMAND: patch -p2 -g0 -E --no-backup-if-mismatch --dry-run -f <
> > >'/var/tmp/portage/media-gfx/structure-synth-1.5.0-r1/files/structure-synth-1.5.0-gl.patch'
> > >
> > >==========================================
> > >can't find file to patch at input line 4
> > [..]
> >
> > Thing is: the source-code of this package has CRLF line endings,
> > and, while I added the CRs to my patch, via mail and saving, you
> > probably saved them with "just" the LFs.
> >
> > a) add the '-l' / '--ignore-whitespace' option to patch, don't know if
> > that works with epatch/eapply as e.g. 'epatch -l ${FILESDIR}/..', or
> >
> > b) reencode the line-endings of the patch to match that of the
> > source-files. No idea if you can reencode the whole patch or just
> > the diff. So ... I'll reattach the patch xzipped, that should keep
> > your mail-client from changing the line-endings. xz -d that patch
> > then into the files subdir. That's probably the easiest way.
> >
> > HTH,
> > -dnh
> >
> > --
> > Chemie ist auch bloß spezialisierte Physik.
> > -- Jens Dittmar in drsst
>
> Moin David,
>
> ;)
>
> nope...currently the cat is more dead than alive...
> I looked at it!
>
>
> I did the following:
>
> vim <patchfile>
> :set ff
> unix
> :set ff=dos
> :wq
> repoman -v manifest (since file has changed)
>
> emerge structure-synth.
>
> BADABOOM! (The fifth element)
>
> See my theorie of uncertainity attached to this mail...
>
> :)
>
> Cheers
> Meino
>
>
Hi,
did the following after the failed CRLF-fix:
(using zsh)
export PATCH_OPTS=-I; emerge structure-synth
which fails the same way...
Cheers
Meino
