On 2017-10-06 20:12, J. Roeleveld wrote:
On 5 October 2017 22:45:50 GMT+02:00, christos kotsis
<christo.ko...@gmail.com> wrote:
I just noticed that ReiserFS has significant performance over ext3, 4
when
dealing with small files.
On 5 Oct 2017 11:32 pm, "christos kotsis" <christo.ko...@gmail.com>
wrote:
If the big data are used often,and I/O performance is desirable, then
I
would go for two partitions.
One would be either ext3 or ext4, with huge block size, while the
second
could be one of two with small block size(minimum 1024).
On 5 Oct 2017 10:46 pm, <p...@xvalheru.org> wrote:
Hi,
Installing gentoo on new laptop and it has 2TB disk. I want to use
1.8TB
for data where will be big files and also huge amount of small files,
thus
I want to ask which FS is best for this. Until now I've used reiserfs
on
cca 0.5TB partition, but I don't know if it's also good choice for
that
big
partition.
I've thought about zfs, but I don't need snapshots and such stuff
mostly
scaling is requirement.
Thanks
Pat
----------------------------------------
Freehosting PIPNI - http://www.pipni.cz/
I had a large partition with reiserfs.
Running fsck always failed due to running out of memory.
Partition was quite a bit larger than 2TB (around 6TB) and contained a
huge (millions) amount of files, but having an fsck become impossible
with 16GB memory available was rather annoying.
--
Joost
Hi,
Thanks to all, it will be dev env, so sources and big DB. I'll try
reiserfs first (I have long time experiences with this one and have 32GB
RAM :-D) and if this fails then xfs.
Thanks again.
Pat
----------------------------------------
Freehosting PIPNI - http://www.pipni.cz/
