On Thursday, 24 August 2017 09:36:43 BST J. Roeleveld wrote: > I can handle HTML emails and won't complain. (As long as they don't set some > idiotic font or background colours)
I don't mind messages which contain both formats and let the mail client render the content according to the preferences of the recipient; i.e. a message with: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; which contains: Content-Type: text/plain; and Content-Type: text/html; However, I have found some mail clients, especially Microsoft web based mailers, send a Base64 blob which *only* contains HTML. I don't like receiving these and depending on the sender I delete them. > But top-posting when replying to emails makes for unnecessary difficult > reading. > > -- > Joost Top-posting when the message is a threaded conversation does not help. Some mobile apps and webmail interfaces make it really difficult to respond inline, so I don't mind being flexible on this matter. PS. I like this list just as it is. Plain text and no-top posting - thank you. :-) -- Regards, Mick
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
