On 03/10/2017 07:28 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 2:50 PM, Corbin Bird <corbinb...@charter.net> wrote:
>>
>> My ISP ( Charter ) merged with Time-Warner. New name "Spectrum"
>>
>> 1 # : Now I have intermittent connectivity.
> 
> Nothing you can do about that if it really is connectivity.
> 
>>
>> 2 # : And with the death of FCC privacy rules, the new ISP is forcing me
>> to update their records ( for sale-of purposes ). This includes phone (
>> all ), SSN, bank account numbers, and credit card numbers.
>>
>> 3 # : the ISP attempting to force agreement to "no communications
>> allowed with the FCC". Also is attempting to force agreement to
>> "Arbitration with the ISP as the Arbiter" for all complaints.
>>
>> 4 # : billing is only online now. Not allowed to see a Account
>> Statement, or receive any "receipt for payment" until I comply with ISP
>> demands.
> 
> While I certainly agree with your frustrations on these, I suspect
> your options are pretty limited if they really are a monopoly.  You
> may just have to live with these if you don't want to do something
> exotic for internet access.
> 
>> 5 # : external e-mail clients ( Thunderbird, Claws-Mail, etc. ) are now
>> starting to have problems. ISP solution -> must use their web based
>> e-mail app only ( only works with Windoze, surprise! ).
>>
>> 6 # : ISP is starting to filter customers web access. The ISP is
>> deciding what sites customers are allowed to see. ( look up the practice
>> called "ransom" ).
> 
> I would see if a VPN works for you.  It would solve these problems at
> least.  Of course, they could do something to block the VPN, but I
> believe some services can work over SSL/etc unless your ISP is
> carefully blacklisting them.
> 
>>
>> NOTE : The ?hijack technique? will corrupt the portage trees if you use
>> "emerge-webrsync".
>>
> 
> Can you define "corrupt" here?  Looking at the source emerge-webrsync
> should at the least do a digest check if available (and if it isn't
> available I'd be interested in that), and if you set the webrsync-gpg
> FEATURE flag in make.conf it should also check the gpg signature.
> Unless your ISP is doing a Gentoo-specific MITM the first should
> detect problems, and unless our gpg checking is completely broken the
> latter should detect anything the ISP tries to do to the file.  They
> could of course prevent you from syncing, but tampering shouldn't be
> an issue.
> 

Now using a VPN.

The "emerge-webrsync" setup that I had been using did have the "gpg"
check functioning.

It is looking like they are attempting to attach or embed a "process" of
some sort, that executes on the local machine.

The first attempt at ?blocking? "emerge-webrsync" did something to the
tarball contents ( ebuilds or metadata damaged ).

Running this command started crashing without error :
"emerge -pv --update --newuse --tree --deep --with-bdeps=y @world"

The second attempt at ?blocking? was to completely block the HTTP
requests generated by "emerge-webrsync".

Going to a VPN, and "emerge --sync" seems to have gotten around them so far.

NOTE : the first "emerge --sync" made lots of complaints indicating the
portage trees had been damaged.

Corbin



Reply via email to