On 161024-22:27+0200, Alarig Le Lay wrote: > On Mon Oct 24 15:49:09 2016, Rich Freeman wrote: > > Why not just share everything via bind mounts in this case? I'd think > > that would have less overhead than rsync/http and then you're not > > storing files twice. > > Because I have several host boxes and I build the packages on only one.
I used to have 3 (even 4) same-hardware machines (well same MBO really) in daily use, and the local mirror is not an overkill long run. And if you look for security, then also Air-Gapping and cloning is a perfect solution, because you get a clean clone for online with an Air-Gapped that does not see online... Some peple like rather btrfs ... I had written a lot about Air-Gapped and cloning on the Forums, but maybe moderators would call it "blogging" if I gave you the link. btrfs I never used OTOH. -- Miroslav Rovis Zagreb, Croatia http://www.CroatiaFidelis.hr
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
