On Tue, 23 Aug 2016 10:15:16 +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote:

> > > I really don't understand the urgency in treecleaning gummiboot.
> > > Like grub1, it will still work in 10 years time...  
> > 
> > I agree, just copy it to a local overlay.  
> 
> How would I manage the distfile, which at present is in dev.gentoo.org?
> I assume it will disappear from there when gummiboot is deleted. Should
> I create a files directory for it
> under /usr/local/portage/sys-boot/gummiboot? What would I do then with
> SRC_URI in the ebuild?

As long as the source file is still in $DISTDIR, you don't need to do
anything. You could put the file somewhere; personal web space, github
etc, and change the SRC_URI to point to it, but that's not really
necessary.

> > If a serious bug does arise, you then have the choice of trying to
> > persuade someone to backport the fix from systemd or switch
> > bootloaders.  
> 
> In fact I think it might be easier to follow Rich's intriguing
> suggestion and install systemd.

That's worth trying out, *before* gummiboot it treecleaned!

> > I've no idea how tightly bootctl (as gummibot is now called after its
> > assimilation in the the systemd collective) is bound to systemd. It
> > may well be feasible to create an ebuild that builds bootctl from the
> > systemd sources without the rest of systemd, as is already done with
> > udev.  
 
> That sounds a bit beyond my abilities at present; I'll bear it in mind 
> though.

Mine too, I was just throwing it out there as an idea for someone to
consider. I use systemd anyway, so the assimilation is ot a problem for
me.


-- 
Neil Bothwick

I'm firm. You're obstinate. He's a pigheaded fool.

Attachment: pgpaTHairiQPL.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to