On Wednesday 11 Nov 2015 20:46:45 Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Wed, 11 Nov 2015 13:07:20 -0700, the...@sys-concept.com wrote: > > >> Is "www-client/chromium" good alternative to firefox? > > > > > > I much prefer it, but that's all it is, personal preference. Try it > > > and decide for yourself. It's a long emerge so you may want to try > > > with chrome first, it's a binary package so much faster to install. > > > > I was just checking out on other forums; chromium is an open source and > > not very well maintain. www-client/google-chrome suppose to be better. > > On what is that claim based? Chromium used the chrome source code with > the proprietary bits removed and the same versions of both are available > in portage.
...and I'm for ever having to recompile chromium as it seems to change about once a week. Not what you would call poorly supported. -- Rgds Peter
