On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 11:09:07AM -0400, cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote: > Jc García <jyo.gar...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > 2015-08-18 10:38 GMT-06:00 <cov...@ccs.covici.com>: > > > So, how do I get the -9999 > > > versions of the ebuilds to give me all the correct files like the 2.16.x > > > versions do? I know the -9999 are from git, but it should do what > > > gentoo wants. > > This isn't realistic, you can't ask the devs to check every commit > > upstream makes, exactly when it makes it, so they could update the > > ebuild, if a 9999 ebuild isn't working try to fix it, Obviously > > somthing changed with the dependecies, maybe versions, considering > > gnome 3.18 is around the corner. Why do you think none of the 9999 > > ebuilds are keyworded? because they're not officially maintained for > > any arch. My advice is wait if you don't want to mess with the > > ebuilds, other wise, open up an editor and start making things work > > for you, a good start would be to check all the autotools files for > > changes in dependencies. > > Well, I would be willing to do that, but the only difference between the > .999 ones and the regular ones is that the .9999 ones inherit virtualx > and they have the following > inherit eutils gnome2 multilib-minimal virtualx > if [[ ${PV} = 9999 ]]; then > inherit gnome2-live > fi > > So, can you give me any guidance as to why multilib is not being > honored? >
The ebuild needs to contain all the steps required to build the software. The build process for these particular pieces of software may have changed enough that the -9999 ebuild does not contain all the steps anymore. As Jc Garcia said earlier: > > Obviously somthing changed with the dependecies, maybe versions, > > considering gnome 3.18 is around the corner. Alec