Heinz Sporn wrote: > Am Donnerstag, den 22.09.2005, 16:26 +0800 schrieb Qiangning Hong: >>Isn't CIFS considered as a better SMBFS? > > It's been said. Still - do you have both SMBFS and CIFS support built > into your kernel, or just CIFS? If the later is true I would include > SMBFS as well and try the same thing with good old SMB as well (you may > use both simultanously anyway).
I add smbfs support in my kernel and tried (after change the filename to an English-only one). It works. However, as my previous mail said, using smbfs doesn't address my problem. I have plenty (~100) large files to transfer, and maybe you've guessed, they are movie files, with Chinese movie title in the filenames. And the movies directories on my winbox have also Chinese characters. If I stick in the smbfs solution, I'll have to do too many manual filename change things. So, I still prefer to find out what's wrong with my cifs and fix it. > Interessting details missing: your kernel and windoze version? Linux r52 2.6.13-suspend2-r4 #4 Wed Sep 21 17:35:55 CST 2005 i686 Intel(R) Pentium(R) M processor 1.73GHz GenuineIntel GNU/Linux Windows XP Professional with SP2. -- Qiangning Hong http://www.hn.org/hongqn (RSS: http://feeds.feedburner.com/hongqn) Registered Linux User #396996 Get Firefox! <http://www.spreadfirefox.com/?q=affiliates&id=67907&t=1> Thunderbird! <http://www.spreadfirefox.com/?q=affiliates&id=67907&t=183> -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
