On Thu, 09 Jul 2015 15:07:40 +0300 Nikos Chantziaras <rea...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 09/07/15 15:01, Gevisz wrote: > > On Thu, 9 Jul 2015 12:48:24 +0100 Neil Bothwick <n...@digimed.co.uk> wrote: > > > >> On Thu, 09 Jul 2015 13:38:43 +0200, Stephan Müller wrote: > >> > >>> As a wild guess into the blue, it could be related to readline. As I > >>> see gentoo's bash uses the standalone readline from coreutils, while > >>> the original bash source maintains an own trimmed version of readline.. > >>> just a thought > >> > >> In that case, re-emerging Bash with USE="-readline" should get rid of the > >> problem. > >> > >> <smug>I can't test it myself as a use a superior shell to Bash</smug> > > > > Which one? And why is it superior to bash? > > Don't ask such questions ;-) > > This is in the same vein as the "emacs vs vim" argument. I guess, it is zsh. Already looking here: http://www.slideshare.net/jaguardesignstudio/why-zsh-is-cooler-than-your-shell-16194692
