On 22/05/2015 12:44, Mick wrote: > On Friday 22 May 2015 09:38:46 Neil Bothwick wrote: >> On Fri, 22 May 2015 02:53:17 -0500, Dale wrote: >>>> So I'm the 3rd one in row to state that I haven't had any deleterious >>>> effects that I noticed. >> >> Make that 4. >> >>> When I first emerge a new kernel, I run make mrproper to get a good >>> clean start. >> >> There's no point in that. When you have just emerged the sources, there is >> nothing for mrproper to remove. > > > So, coming back to the OP, is it advisable to ignore this message:
No. It's in the ebuild and we assume the ebuild writer had a reason for putting it there. The usual reason is that upstream has said their code requires an option to be set. Where would you have gotten the idea that ignoring it is good advice? > > * Messages for package www-client/chromium-43.0.2357.65: > [27/1984] > > * USER_NS is required for sandbox to work > * Please check to make sure these options are set correctly. > * Failure to do so may cause unexpected problems. > > which doesn't even advise where to find USER_NS, or will chromium no longer > work as it did in the past? > -- Alan McKinnon [email protected]
