On Thursday 12 Mar 2015 22:46:14 Mike Gilbert wrote: > On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 7:38 AM, Rich Freeman <ri...@gentoo.org> wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 7:05 AM, Neil Bothwick <n...@digimed.co.uk> wrote: > >> On Wed, 11 Mar 2015 06:20:25 +0000, Mick wrote: > >>> > Google only keeps the latest versions so that ebuild is usually only > >>> > good for a short while after it gets marked stable. > >>> > Just keyword the unstable package. > >>> > >>> So users of the stable package have to be really fast, or lucky? > >> > >> Gentoo should keep a copy in its mirrors for as long as a current ebuild > >> needs it (unless the package is fetch-restricted). > > > > Chrome is mirror-restricted, because of: > > 9.2 Subject to section 1.2, you may not (and you may not permit anyone > > else to) copy, modify, create a derivative work of, reverse engineer, > > decompile or otherwise attempt to extract the source code of the > > Software or any part thereof, unless this is expressly permitted or > > required by law, or unless you have been specifically told that you > > may do so by Google, in writing. > > > > chrome-binary-plugins is not free software, or open source. There is > > little Gentoo can do when they keep changing the URL/hash without > > warning. > > > > You can file a bug to get the ebuild updated though. > > As the person doing the bumps, I would actually prefer that people > ping me in IRC before creating a bug report. It's annoying to have to > close a bug report for an issue that occurs quite frequently.
Don't mind doing this if it will help - what's your nick? -- Regards, Mick
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
