On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 04:28:26PM -0500, Rich Freeman wrote > > I wonder how small linux can actually get in such a world, assuming > you still needed the multitasking, drivers, etc (which would be the > main benefits of running an OS vs just embedding a single program > written in C that directly talks to the hardware). You can trim a lot > of stuff out of linux that we all take for granted, but I'm not sure > if you can really get it into the 100kb range.
*BSD would be a better candidate, in terms of a smaller kernel to start with. And I'm sure that legal would be a lot happier about not having to supply source code. -- Walter Dnes <waltd...@waltdnes.org> I don't run "desktop environments"; I run useful applications
