On Tuesday 07 Oct 2014 22:56:28 Mike Gilbert wrote: > On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 5:48 PM, Mick <michaelkintz...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Tuesday 07 Oct 2014 17:08:11 Neil Bothwick wrote: > >> On Tue, 07 Oct 2014 16:39:11 +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote: > >> > > Check /etc/portage/repos.conf > >> > > >> > That's it! Many thanks, Bruce. > >> > >> Indeed. That directory was either empty or absent on all my systems. > >> copying repos.conf from /usr/share/portage and modifying the path got > >> rid of the message. > > > > Shouldn't this file be populated by settings in /etc/portage/make.conf? > > > > I can't recall editing manually and it seems to have bespoke settings > > that I have in make.conf ... > > Quite the opposite. Ideally, you should remove the PORTDIR setting > from make.conf. repos.conf is the newer, more flexible way to > configure it. > > Unfortunately, that will break some of the third-party portage tools > which parse make.conf directly.
<Scratches head> ... so are we supposed to guess this, wait for a news article somewhere, or will it show up in an emerge log somewhere? -- Regards, Mick
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
