On Tuesday 07 Oct 2014 15:48:33 Philip Webb wrote: > 141007 Pavel Volkov wrote: > > On Sunday, October 5, 2014 9:10:50 PM MSK, Alan McKinnon wrote: > >> I haven't used konqueror as a browser in many many months, > >> I get along just fine with Firefox and Chromium. > >> I believe Konqueror is essentially unmaintained these days > >> or at least on life support. Make a fine file manager though > >> (kparts has always been one of KDE's very much better ideas) > > > > I think there was a tendency to replace Konqueror with rekonq > > in KDE-based distros. Can somebody comment on how rekonq is doing? > > I dropped Konqueror as an alternative browser recently > after it refused to accept every URL as malformed. > Rekonq is an adequate replacement + Firefox for regular use ; > I also use Lynx when I want text copies of WWW dox. > My window manager is Fluxbox.
I still use Konqueror as file manager, ssh/ftp/webdav client and occasionally as an Internet browser. However, I have set it up to use WebKit as its browser engine instead of KHTML. -- Regards, Mick
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
