On Sat, Sep 6, 2014 at 10:05 AM, Alan McKinnon <alan.mckin...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 06/09/2014 15:13, Rich Freeman wrote: >> On Sat, Sep 6, 2014 at 8:54 AM, Alan McKinnon <alan.mckin...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >>> >>> ZFS is the most resilient filesystem I've ever used, you can through the >>> bucket and kitchen sink at it and it really doesn't give a shit (it just >>> deals with it :-) ) >>> >> >> Nothing wrong with ZFS itself, but keep in mind that ZFS on linux is >> not the same as ZFS on Solaris as far as maturity goes. I'll admit >> that I'm a btrfs fan for a couple of reasons, but when it comes to >> stability on linux I wouldn't put either in the same class as ext3, or >> even ext4 (which is pretty mature now). > > > I neglected to mention - I use ZFS on FreeBSD, haven't used ZFS on linux > enought o comment on that >
I'm not an expert on ZFS, but I believe that it is considered more stable on FreeBSD, since I believe they used the original CDDL sources there. It still hasn't been around for as long as it has been on Solaris of course, but it is a bit more mainstream on BSD. -- Rich
