On Thursday, May 08, 2014 02:36:29 PM Andrew Savchenko wrote: > On Wed, 07 May 2014 20:57:29 +0200 J. Roeleveld wrote: > > On 7 May 2014 20:11:10 CEST, Walter Dnes <waltd...@waltdnes.org> > > > > wrote: > > >On Wed, May 07, 2014 at 08:11:02AM +0200, J. Roeleveld wrote > > > > > >> On Tuesday, May 06, 2014 05:34:52 PM Walter Dnes wrote: > > >> > Unfortunately, mdev != udev. People running RAID have > > >> > > > >> > problems > > > > > >too. > > > > > >> I know it isn't. I just find it strange that LVM can't work > > >> without udev when I see options which configure the LVM-tools > > >> to either double-check udevs actions or even completely bypass > > > > > >> udev: > > > Thanks for the pointer. After turning off the udev-related > > > options in > > > > > >lvm.conf, I'm getting /dev/mapper device nodes as expected. > > > > That is good. Now if only mdadm can be confirmed to work with > > mdev. I could try it on one of my machines. > > And what is the problem with mdadm with mdev?
Only that Walter mentioned that people with Raid have issues too. > I have such setup: > nothing special here and works fine. > > Just to speed up device lookup: > > $ grep -v ^# /etc/mdadm.conf > DEVICE /dev/sd* > > And here we go: > > $ cat /proc/mdstat > Personalities : [raid10] > md0 : active raid10 sdd[3] sdf[2] > 2930265088 blocks super 1.2 256K chunks 2 far-copies [2/2] [UU] Do the devices get created correctly in /dev as well? Many thanks, Joost
