Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On 21/11/2013 17:10, Mateusz Kowalczyk wrote:
>> Greetings,
>>
>> I spent a chunk of yesterday updating world on my machines (2 file
>> servers and 1 netbook) and with some effort, the updates went through. I
>> had to go out today so I rebooted my netbook and I started noticing
>> weird graphical glitches in certain applications, as if parts of the
>> screen weren't updating, namely in urxvt and emacs. In urxvt, my shell
>> prompt seems to not render the cursor and often keeps the letters I
>> remove still on the prompt (only graphically, they aren't actually
>> there). This is extremely annoying.
>>
>> It's also terrible in emacs: cursor sometimes doesn't get rendered and I
>> get tons of artefacts from different buffers when I switch or from text
>> I was editing. You can find an example image of such glitches in emacs
>> at [1]. This is absolutely tragic for me as I spend majority of my time
>> in emacs. I'd like to note that I'm running emacs in a graphical frame
>> and not in a terminal.
>
> A quick note to say that you are not alone, I get this as well since
> about 6 weeks ago (a ~amd system). So it's not something you and just
> you managed to do, I got it as well.
>
> In my case it's as if the system's idea of what is on the screen is off
> by one row of pixels. I get a stray row of dots at the top of lines that
> correspond to the risers of glyphs on the previous line, and new
> underscores don't show up until I enter a newline.
>
> This is a mostly KDE system using konsole, so it's not the terminal
> emulator or editor that's the root cause.
>

Some may recall I have posted about similar issues in the past.  Heck, I
still do when I upgrade the drivers.  I'm stuck using a older driver but
still run into the issue every once in a while. 

The biggest giveaway for me is that my clock is stuck.  I have mine set
to show seconds and it either stops or the time sort of jumps several
seconds at a time. 

It's weird but as Alan said, it is not just you.  You got plenty of
company on this one. 

Dale

:-)  :-) 

-- 
I am only responsible for what I said ... Not for what you understood or how 
you interpreted my words!


Reply via email to