Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Fri, 19 Jul 2013 03:22:11 -0500, Dale wrote:
Do you really want to put /home on a SSD?
Why not?
/home is the most frequently-read directory on most systems, and SSD
is ideal for that.
If you are concerned about wear-levelling, /home is not the danger
point
Interesting. I'm not sure I would want mine on a SSD even if it would
fit on one. The only part that might help would be my .kde
and .mozilla directory.
SSDs are not like USB flash drives, and it's been years since I managed
to wear one of those out (mainly due to a kernel bug). They have
lifetimes similar to spinny disks these days.
Now I really feel about better getting one. That was my concern and
reason for the question. I'm sure /home gets its share of reads and
writes and was thinking the writes would cause a problem over time.
Maybe they are better now than they was a while back.
Thanks for the update.
Dale
:-) :-)
--
I am only responsible for what I said ... Not for what you understood or how
you interpreted my words!
