Thomas Schmitt <scdbac...@gmx.net> wrote:
> My proposal is to fix and test growisofs.
Well, growisofs is unmaintained since 5 years. The question is whether such a
change would be suffucuent or whether there are many more problem (see the mode
select problem I mentioned).
> joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de wrote:
> > has many places where is returns the unly slightly modified result of a SCSI
> > mode sense operation while running a SCSI mode select operation. As it only
> > slightly modifies the received data instead of constructing SCSI standard
> > compliant data, these mode select operations do not always have the desired
> > effect.
>
> How else should one learn the current settings in order _not_
> to change those which are non-changeable ?
I recommend you to read the SCSI standard and to have a look at what growisofs
actually does. I know that the code is hard to read, so it is easy to overlook
the problems...
Jörg
--
EMail:jo...@schily.isdn.cs.tu-berlin.de (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
j...@cs.tu-berlin.de (uni)
joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de (work) Blog:
http://schily.blogspot.com/
URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily
