Thomas Schmitt <scdbac...@gmx.net> wrote: > My proposal is to fix and test growisofs.
Well, growisofs is unmaintained since 5 years. The question is whether such a change would be suffucuent or whether there are many more problem (see the mode select problem I mentioned). > joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de wrote: > > has many places where is returns the unly slightly modified result of a SCSI > > mode sense operation while running a SCSI mode select operation. As it only > > slightly modifies the received data instead of constructing SCSI standard > > compliant data, these mode select operations do not always have the desired > > effect. > > How else should one learn the current settings in order _not_ > to change those which are non-changeable ? I recommend you to read the SCSI standard and to have a look at what growisofs actually does. I know that the code is hard to read, so it is easy to overlook the problems... Jörg -- EMail:jo...@schily.isdn.cs.tu-berlin.de (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin j...@cs.tu-berlin.de (uni) joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/ URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily