On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 09:44:34PM -0500, Dale wrote:
> Walter Dnes wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 07:39:39AM -0500, Dale wrote
> >
> >> Someone else ran into the same thing and it appears they use udev. So
> >> switching wouldn't help anyway.
> >>
> >> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=370217
> > Your bug-report comment shows...
> > sys-fs/lvm2-2.02.97-r1 USE="lvm1 readline static thin udev (-clvm) (-cman)
> > (-selinux) -static-libs"
> >
> > Other comments note that unsetting "static" allows it to build. Try
> > unsetting the "static" flag for lvm2 in package.use, i.e...
> >
> > sys-fs/lvm2 -static
> >
> > Does that build for you?
> >
>
>
> It might would but I can't recall WHY I set it to that. If I set it
> that way in package.use, which is rare for me, then I had to have a good
> reason. I need to start making notes on this stuff. ;-)
>
> It will likely be fixed pretty soon so as long as I don't have to
> upgrade, I should be OK with the one installed now. It was just a
> recompile from emerge -e world but I found it odd that it worked before
> but not the other day.
>
> If I have to tho, I'll keep that in mind.
You might want to run "enalyze rebuild use" to get an idea of what USE flags
you have which do not match the default settings. Over the course of time the
defaults change, and our need for certain options change, so it's good to run
this and check any USE flags for situations such as yours above, where one
would say, "I can't recall WHY I set it to that." If you can't find a reason
then it's best to stick with the default settings most of the time. This is
all that command will do on your system:
mingdao@server ~ $ enalyze rebuild use
-- Scanning installed packages for USE flag settings that
do not match the default settings
-- preparing pkgs for file entries
- Saving file: /home/mingdao/package.use.test
- Done
Bruce
--
Happy Penguin Computers >')
126 Fenco Drive ( \
Tupelo, MS 38801 ^^
supp...@happypenguincomputers.com
662-269-2706 662-205-6424
http://happypenguincomputers.com/
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?
Don't top-post: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Top_post#Top-posting
