On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 06:40:02PM +0200, Florian Philipp wrote: > >> Windows compatibility is not a must, but a nice-to-have. That would reduce > >> my > >> remaining choices to ExFAT, I presume. > > > > BTW: What's the Linux status on that one?
Well, the German Wikipedia says that a stable 1.0 came out in January. It’s “only” a FUSE fs, but so is NTFS. I’ll do some testing with it. > > That's how I see it too. > > > > I used to use ext4 for external media but quickly found that my notebook > > was the only box that could use them... > > Isn't group id 100 defined as the users group on most Linuxen nowadays? > > chgrp 100 $mount && chmod 2777 $mount That still leaves UID. I want it to “just work”[TM] and never encounter any problems when I can least use them, and never have to check any file attributes. > should work reasonably well. > > Regards, > Florian Philipp I’ll keep the uid and gid bit on the stack. I would disable the x bit though. Executables are lime in DIR_COLORS, overriding every other colouring (e.g. red archive, green text and purple media files). *g* I’m more concerned about the behaviour of automounters. And I faintly remember some user-centric setting as to what the default chmod of new files is, so I would have to do some chmod -R from time to time. -- Gruß | Greetings | Qapla’ Please do not share anything from, with or about me with any Facebook service. Everyone speaks of saving energy. I save mine.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
