On 04/24/2013 11:39 AM, Tanstaafl wrote: > On 2013-04-23 12:34 PM, Florian Philipp <li...@binarywings.net> wrote: >> Am 23.04.2013 16:44, schrieb Tanstaafl: >>> /boot (ext2), 100M >>> /swap, 2G >>> / (ext4), 40G >>> >>> then on LVM >>> >>> /tmp (ext2), 5G? <- how big? >>> /var/tmp (ext2), 5G? <- how big? > >> If this is a production server I wouldn't use ext2. In the case of a >> crash or reboot, you don't want to loose precious uptime just because of >> fsck or corrupted file systems. > > Noted, changed these to ext4...
Sideways question: Are there disk-based filesystems which don't persist? I don't think I've heard of any, short of cranking up the amount of space dedicated to swap, and using tmpfs.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
