William Kenworthy wrote: > I find filesystems are very much a case of YMMV :) > > I will NOT use an ext fs again willingly - lost too many whole systems, > corruption - Ive had less problems with DOS! > > Reiserfs, has had its "moments" but is by far the most stable system, > though NTFS isnt bad these days either. > > btrfs - I am using this for backups systems and under a cephfs rbd store > for VM's. Not bad ... but definitely not stable though its months since > I have lost a whole system ... I am also using it as the primary file > system on an apple macbook air (ssd) and for the OS on an ssd for a vm > server host and its been problem free on both. > > BillK >
I think Alan said it best but I just can't resist sharing this: http://blogs.computerworld.com/15413/the_best_linux_file_system_of_all That is about Google switching all their servers to . . . . ext4. This is like asking which brand of hard drive is best. No matter who it is, every single person has had at least one drive fail and will never use that brand again. lol Just for giggles. Dale :-) :-) -- I am only responsible for what I said ... Not for what you understood or how you interpreted my words!
