On Tue, 12 Mar 2013 13:29:38 +0200 Alan McKinnon <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> We should be pounding away on the fact that we're running out of > >> IP > >> > addresses... period... end of story. If people ask about NAT, > >> > then mention that the undersupply will be so bad that even NAT > >> > won't help. > > In my presentations, I've stopped bothering to wait for people to > > ask about NAT, because it starts off in their minds from nearly the > > beginning--and until they get that question answered, most of what > > I say washes past them as ancillary and not as important as the > > question pressing on their minds. > > > > In one short paragraph you said exactly what I was trying to say in 4 > mails (and still didn't succeed) You know I agree except the only people that brought NAT up and got fixated on it were those that were advocating ipv6!?!?
