On 10/03/2013 23:07, Michael Mol wrote: >> All those examples you give are much like a bunch of home machines >> > sitting behind a NAT gateway onto the internet. That's actually OK >> > and I reckon that is the intended use of NAT. > I want to point out that that's only true if the home network has at > least one public IP. If you've got NAT 4x4, you're kinda screwed. > > (Alan will understand that, but for those unfamiliar with it, that > basically means that if your home router is given an RFC1918 address by > your ISP, port forwarding isn't going to do squat for you.)
I'm getting images of NATted traffic being NATted. My head just exploded. -- Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com
