On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 3:37 PM, Tanstaafl <tansta...@libertytrek.org> wrote: > On 2013-02-07 4:25 PM, Paul Hartman <paul.hartman+gen...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 2:53 PM, Tanstaafl <tansta...@libertytrek.org> >> wrote: >>> >>> I think that a lot of people will misread that like I (we) did... > > >> I believe he is correct and /dev/shm is irrelevant for this discussion. > > > Ok, thanks, but... and no offense... > > I am not willing to gamble on breaking a remotely accessed server based on > someone's 'I believe that this is correct' comment.
No offense at all, it's your system and you make the call. My story was anecdotal, not authoritative. :)
