On 4/1/2013, "Randy Barlow" <ra...@electronsweatshop.com> wrote:
>On 01/03/2013 12:09 PM, Peter Humphrey wrote: >> Does anyone recommend a mail client that doesn't rely too heavily on the >> mouse? I much prefer to navigate, reply etc with the keyboard. I've >> seen Evolution recommended; is that OK? > >Thunderbird is my favorite mail client. You can do a lot with the KB. >For example, go to next read mail is just 'n' for next. CTRL-R for >reply. It's not bad to learn the shortcuts. Plus it has a lot of great >features and extensions. I'm trying to set Thunderbird up, but I'm not telling it the right values to connect to my ISP's POP server. I suppose I should have a rest and try again tomorrow. Thanks for the recommendation. >For CLI clients, I sometimes use Mutt. It's a little bit of a pain to >configure for IMAP, but once you get it going it's pretty cool. I may even have to resort to Mutt if I can't get anything else running. What a state to be in in 2013! (I don't imply that Mutt's not good, just that Kmail should never have been released in its present state. Doesn't anyone ever learn?)
