Nuno J. Silva wrote: > My thanks, too! There's nothing like reading on some actual experience > with this. So this was once the reason to keep / separate. Not that > important anymore (but this is still no excuse to force people to keep > /usr in the same filesystem).
Mines on a separate partition because it is on LVM instead of a regular partition. Actually, only / and /boot is on a regular partition. Everything else is on LVM. I don't have / on LVM because I don't want to use a init thingy. I just wonder, how many people still have /usr on a separate partition. Like most things, there is no way to really know. Dale :-) :-) -- I am only responsible for what I said ... Not for what you understood or how you interpreted my words!
