Am Freitag, 14. Dezember 2012, 21:34:54 schrieb Kevin Chadwick: > On Fri, 14 Dec 2012 08:53:35 -0800 > > Mark Knecht <markkne...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I guess the other question that's lurking here for me is why do you > > have /usr on a separate partition? What's the usage model that drives > > a person to do that? The most I've ever done is move /usr/portage and > > /usr/src to other places. My /usr never has all that much in it beyond > > those two directories, along with maybe /usr/share. Would it not be > > easier for you in the long run to move /usr back to / and not have to > > deal with this question at all? > > It should be moving in the other direction for stability reasons and > busybox is no full answer. > > On OpenBSD which has the benefit of userland being part of it. All the > critical single user binaries are in root and built statically as much > as possible, maximising system reliability no matter the custom > requirements or packages.
until a flaw is found in one of the libs used and all those statically linked binaries are in danger. Well done! -- #163933
