On 2012-12-14 17:53, Mark Knecht wrote: > I guess the other question that's lurking here for me is why do you > have /usr on a separate partition? What's the usage model that drives > a person to do that? The most I've ever done is move /usr/portage and > /usr/src to other places. My /usr never has all that much in it beyond > those two directories, along with maybe /usr/share. Would it not be > easier for you in the long run to move /usr back to / and not have to > deal with this question at all?
I don't want easy to supplant flexibility[1]. It really is that simple. And this is my firm _opinion_ in the matter, I'm not interested in another flame war, please. [1] I'm actually planning to get rid of partitions (/, /boot, /usr, /home, /var, /tmp) alltogether and replacing them with separate, smaller, ssds. Best regards Peter K
