Michael Mol wrote: > On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 11:23 AM, Alan McKinnon <alan.mckin...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> On Fri, 14 Dec 2012 15:26:25 +0200 >> Nikos Chantziaras <rea...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> On 14/12/12 14:19, Dale wrote: >>>> I'm thinking of switching and getting rid of the init thingy >>> Huh? >> Once upon a time, not so long ago, Dale happened to try and make an >> initrd. He followed the rules and the docs and it blew up in his face. >> It blew up more in his face than HAL did even longer ago (and that was >> pretty spectacular). >> >> Somewhere in that thread the words "init thingy" were used in >> frustration, and it's since become a meme, a disparaging reference to >> initrd for those who don't like the idea of them. >> >> Dale is getting famous at this, if ever we need someone to find the >> really bad bugs in basic software, just mark it stable enough so that >> Dale will use it. He will find the bugs that no-one else ever could, >> it's just a knack he has. >> >> Long live Dale. > Hear! Hear! > > Dale, would you be interested in jobs doing software testing? If I see > openings, I'd be happy to forward them your way... > > > -- > :wq > >
I thought I did that already. ROFL Dale :-) :-) -- I am only responsible for what I said ... Not for what you understood or how you interpreted my words!
