On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 7:11 PM, Keith Dart <ke...@dartworks.biz> wrote:
> Re
> 509D8E00.4030208@coolmail.se509D8E00.4030208@coolmail.sek7k1hn$ce6$1...@ger.gmane.org,
> Dale said:
>> I don't worry about boot up times much either.  Here is why:
>
>
> I was thinking of converting to systemd on my Gentoo laptop. There I do
> boot frequently, and could benefit from quicker bootups.

As 微蔡 said, fast boots is only one of the many advantages that systemd
offers. It's probably the most user-visible, though.

> So I'm happy
> to some success stories with it, since I've been holding off on taking
> that plunge.

We have had some of those lately. I believe João Matos just did the
switch some weeks ago, using KDE. I did it almost two years ago,
around December 2010, using GNOME (then 2, now 3). I haven't heard any
insurmountable problem when switching: if you are a regular desktop or
simple server user, it probably will work without you needing to do
anything special (except using init=/usr/bin/systemd in your kernel
command line and maybe needing to reemerge a couple of packages with
USE="systemd"). If you use something more complicated (RAID, LVM, NFS,
that kind of stuff), you probably will  need to enable or perhaps
change a couple of services, but that's it. If you use a not very
common daemon, maybe you will need to write its service file; but it's
ridiculous easy (specially when compared to sysvinit scripts).

Just a word of advice: if you are a normal laptop user, systemd has
replaced most of the functionality of consolekit; so if you boot with
systemd, several packages need to have enable the systemd USE flag
(and the consolekit one disabled). In particular, pambase and polkit
need to set either systemd or consolekit, but cannot set both.

Regards.
-- 
Canek Peláez Valdés
Posgrado en Ciencia e Ingeniería de la Computación
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México

Reply via email to