On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 10:17 AM, Grant Edwards <grant.b.edwa...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > http://www.pckeyboard.com/ > > I was thrilled when I saw they offered a "spacesaver M" model. I > thought it was going to be a clone of the IBM 84-key model M "space > saver" that IBM sold back in 87-89. > > Nope. It's the same desk-hogging size as a regular M -- not really > sure where the "space saving" comes from.
I have both the classic and spacesaver models and the spacesaver is definitely smaller. The size of the keys/keyboard layout are the same, however, it's the size of the casing that is different. There is more area to left and right and a much larger area to the north of the function keys. The classic weighs about ~1 pound more than the spacesaver, too. Compared to any other modern keyboard the spacesaver is probably the same or bigger, though. But my point is that the original is huge. :)