On Saturday 03 Nov 2012 00:22:52 Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On Sat, 3 Nov 2012 00:11:34 +0000
> 
> Mick <michaelkintz...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Friday 02 Nov 2012 06:21:39 Mick wrote:
> > > On Thursday 01 Nov 2012 13:46:20 Mark Knecht wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 11:54 PM, Mick
> > > > 
> > > > <michaelkintz...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > On Thursday 01 Nov 2012 03:53:44 Bill Kenworthy wrote:
> > > > >> On Wed, 2012-10-31 at 23:12 -0400, Philip Webb wrote:
> > > > >> > 121101 Bill Kenworthy wrote:
> > > > >> > > On Wed, 2012-10-31 at 22:46 +0000, Mick wrote:
> > > > >> > >> I was thinking of using razor-qt
> > > > >> > > 
> > > > >> > > From the Oct 20 automated package removal email
> > > > >> > > you might want to investigate why before moving to it.
> > > > >> > > 
> > > > >> > >   x11-wm/razorqt                          2012-10-22
> > > > >> > > 
> > > > >> > > 10:00:01 yngwin x11-misc/lightdm-razorqt-greeter
> > > > >> > > 2012-10-22 10:01:35
> > > > >> > > 
> > > > >> > >     yngwin
> > > > >> > 
> > > > >> > As sometimes happens, "removal" really means "moved" :
> > > > >> > it has a new Portage category all to itself, like Xfce.
> > > > >> 
> > > > >> Thanks for clarifying.
> > > > >> 
> > > > >> BillK
> > > > > 
> > > > > Phew!  Just as I was about to hit the abort button.  :-)
> > > > > 
> > > > > Has anyone tried it and can comment how it compares to KDE?
> > > > > --
> > > > > Regards,
> > > > > Mick
> > > > 
> > > > Mick,
> > > > 
> > > >    I've used 0.4.2 a bit. It worked fine but as a KDE user it
> > > > 
> > > > felt a
> > > > 
> > > > little strange. I didn't invest much time to make myself more
> > > > comfortable.
> > > > 
> > > >    My trading partner who is newer to Linux (about 1 year now) has
> > > > 
> > > > been using razor-qt for the last month or so. He was fine with
> > > > 0.4.2 but when they moved the package group they also had an
> > > > update to 0.5. Unfortunately this did not produce correct
> > > > resolutions on one of his three monitors so he's back to running
> > > > KDE and doing updates on razor until that gets fixed. (TTBOMK he
> > > > has not filed a bug report.)
> > > 
> > > Thank you all for your responses.  The PC in question has two
> > > monitors, with different resolutions, so I will be needing this to
> > > work fine (or will never hear the end of it).
> > > 
> > > I'll make some time to try it out over the weekend and if they
> > > don't like it I may push the boat out and switch to e17 (which I am
> > > more familiar with).
> > 
> > Ahhh!  Abort - Abort!
> > 
> > It tries to load Gnome packages ...
> > 
> > Calculating dependencies... done!
> > [ebuild  N     ] gnome-base/gnome-common-3.1.0  148 kB
> > [ebuild  N     ] dev-lang/vala-0.12.1  USE="vapigen -test" 2,233 kB
> > [ebuild  N     ] dev-util/gdbus-codegen-2.32.4
> > PYTHON_TARGETS="python2_7 python3_2 -python2_5 -python2_6 -python3_1"
> > 0 kB [ebuild  N     ] sys-apps/accountsservice-0.6.22
> > USE="introspection -doc - vala" 324 kB
> > [ebuild  N     ] x11-misc/lightdm-1.0.11  USE="introspection qt4
> > -branding - gtk -test" 636 kB
> > [snip ...]
> > 
> > I thought it was USE=branding in lightdm that did it, but I disabled
> > branding for lightdm, so I don't know what's pulling these in.
> > 
> > It seems that I'll need to try it with kdm instead.
> 
> use the -t option to emerge.
> 
> that will tell you in a tree display what pulls in what.
> Reading the ebuild for that package tells you why.

Thanks Alan, I set USE="-lightdm" and installed it without gnome dependencies.

It seems lightweight enough and troublefree.  The only two thinks I couldn't 
find how to set is:

1. Primary monitor:

The taskbar (or whatever you call it) at the bottom of the screen.  The user 
has two monitors of different dimensions and in KDE I had it set to show the 
taskbar in the right monitor 1920x1080, i.e. using the right monitor as the 
main monitor.  Instead with razor-qt the left monitor 1280x1024 is set as the 
default monitor with the taskbar at its bottom.

2. GPG-agent:

KDE starts gpg/ssh agents with its start-up script.  Razor-qt does not seem to 
have something similar to clear existing gpg agent processes and start new 
when the desktop loads.
-- 
Regards,
Mick

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Reply via email to