On Oct 26, 2012 6:14 AM, "Michael Mol" <mike...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 3:40 PM, Pandu Poluan <pa...@poluan.info> wrote: >> >> >> On Oct 25, 2012 10:08 AM, "Michael Mol" <mike...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> > >> > http://lwn.net/Articles/521022/ >> > >> > Links to relevant analysis. Useful comments. 'nuff said. >> > >> > -- >> > :wq >> >> Nice find, thanks. > > > They have an RSS feed. Good stuff. I heard about this before it hit Slashdot or Phoronix. The subscriber stuff is _truly_ good. >
Thanks! >> >> But the update to that article which gave a link to Theo T'so email is quite unnerving. He said that his initial hypothesis had not been proven and he himself is back in the dark. >> >> Not much confidence in ext4 for the time being for me. Back to reiserfs? ;-) > > Consider the trillions of operational hours of ext4 without incident...you're just trolling. > I plead guilty, your honor :-P Okay, I'm not serious about dumping ext4 for ReiserFS. But my confidence is still shaken. I'm going to implement a more severe watch+backup strategy for all ext4 partitions. Rgds, --
