Philip Webb wrote: > 120801 Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: >> Kingston is way too expensive for their low quality products. >> You can just buy some cheapo 'almost' noname brand and get better results. > At my regular store (no, I'm not schlepping all over town), I see : > > AMD Entertainment 4 GB DDR3 1600 MHz CL9 Optimized for AMD : 24.99 > > They have 8 in stock, which suggests they're popular with customers. > I'm sceptical re 'optimized for AMD', but it is the same manufacturer. > This is 1600 MHz a/a the Kingston, which is 1330 MHz , > but I want to re-use a stick I already own from another machine > which is also a Kingston 4 GB 1330 MHz , so I won't be using the speed. > I've never had a problem with Kingston memory nor with their USB sticks, > so I need a bit more convincing (smile). > >
Kingston should work fine. I been using them for years, one build was built back in 2003 and it still runs, although slowly by todays standards. ;-) I have also used Kingston in other people's rigs for upgrades and they are working fine too. I think memory is like hard drives, one or two people have something go wrong and they have to be all bad for everyone. It's one reason I hate asking a hard drive question. Someone always chimes up that they had one fail many years ago so it just has to be bad. lol Dale :-) :-) -- I am only responsible for what I said ... Not for what you understood or how you interpreted my words!
