120510 Dale wrote: > Philip Webb wrote: >> I have a lot of images scanned from old negatives of non-standard sizes, >> which I had to split up into halves or quarters to process; >> I was careful to use the same settings for each of the sub-parts. >> Now I want to reassemble them into the original whole pictures. > I have used hugin but it has been a while. > As long as you have enough points tied together, it works fine. > I have taken as many as 30 pictures and stitched them together. > I had three rows of 10. It was of a park and it looked great when done. > It took a couple tries to get it just right but it did a good job > and that was a good size project. Doing 4 or 5 pictures is pretty easy. > Lots of overlap is the key tho.
120510 Alex Shuster wrote : > I'd use ImageMagick's montage command. > You have to find out how exactly to do this, but once you know this, > you can automate this and process them all at once in a loop. > See http://www.imagemagick.org/Usage/ > and esp http://www.imagemagick.org/Usage/montage/ Thanks to both ! -- Imagemagick looks as if it's very technical & I'm not sure how it would handle matching overlapping photos. That is what Corbet described doing & Dale seems to have done, so I'll emerge Hugin & see what it can do. As I now notice, the negatives I want to use right now are not split, but there are many others which are, so this wb useful eventually. -- ========================,,============================================ SUPPORT ___________//___, Philip Webb ELECTRIC /] [] [] [] [] []| Cities Centre, University of Toronto TRANSIT `-O----------O---' purslowatchassdotutorontodotca
