On 17/04/12 19:39, Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Tue, 17 Apr 2012 18:41:55 +0300
Nikos Chantziaras<rea...@gmail.com> wrote:
On 17/04/12 18:34, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
On 17/04/12 18:10, Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Tue, 17 Apr 2012 18:01:43 +0300
Nikos Chantziaras<rea...@gmail.com> wrote:
emerge --depclean seems to have bugged out for me:
* Dependencies could not be completely resolved due to
* the following required packages not being installed:
*
* =dev-libs/openssl-0.9.8* pulled in by:
* app-emulation/vmware-workstation-8.0.2.591240
*
* dev-libs/openssl:0.9.8 pulled in by:
* www-client/google-chrome-19.0.1084.24_beta131971
It says to do a "emerge --update --newuse --deep --with-bdeps=y
@world". Which is what I just did to begin with (and running it
again doesn't result in anything getting emerged.)
[...]
One thing that strikes me as a possibility is that the highest numbered
version has the lower slot number (0). I know that SLOT names are
just names and not supposed to be treated like they form an order, but
I've seen odd things like this before. I think KDE did it to me once.
What happens if you emerge openssl:0.9.8, let it go into world, then
run depclean? The build takes 2 minutes and you can easily remove it
from world later.
Nope, nothing changed.
