On Thursday, April 05, 2012 01:10:46 PM Canek Peláez Valdés wrote: > On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 2:47 AM, 张春江 <zhangchunjian...@126.com> wrote: > > On 2012-04-05 01:29:36，"Canek Peláez Valdés" <can...@gmail.com> wrote： > > > >>On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 12:28 PM, Canek Peláez Valdés <can...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> Something is wrong. There is no dracut messages in your dmesg output, > >>> so either you are not using the rd.debug command line (which, > >>> according to your logs, you *are* using), or you are not using a > >>> dracut-created initramfs, or the initramfs is somehow corrupted. > > > > I used > > # dracut -H -f > > to create my initramfs. I don't know why there is no dracut message in > > my dmesg output. > > > >>> Can I see your grub.cfg file, as it is please? Also, it seems that th > >>>e > >>> problem is OpenRC not creating the /run tmpfs early on during the boo > >>>t > >>> process: > >>> > >>> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=409921 > >>> > >>> Until that gets fixed, recent versions of plymouth cannot work with > >>> OpenRC. Maybe you could try an old version? > >>> > >>> Regards. > >> > >>Also, can I see your fstab? It seems you use quite the complex setup > >>for your partitions. > >> > > The latest version of plymouth is 0.9_pre20111013-r1. > > I installed sys-boot/plymouth-0.8.3-r5 but it still couldn't work, just > > like v0.9_pre. There is no ebuild for other versions. > > Then I tried to install by tarball, but version 0.8.1 and 0.8.2 have a > > make error: "fatal error: drm/drm.h: No such file or directory", but I > > have already installed x11-libs/libdrm and all the other drm related > > applications are masked. Version 0.7.2 have an another make error. > > > > This is my grub.conf: > > default 0 > > timeout 5 > > #splashimage=(hd0,13)/boot/grub/splash.xpm.gz > > > > title Gentoo Linux > > root (hd0,13) > > kernel /boot/kernel-3.2.1-gentoo-r2 root=/dev/sda10 splash quiet > > video=radeon:1366x768 initrd /boot/initramfs-3.2.1-gentoo-r2.img > > > > title Win7 > > rootnoverify (hd0,0) > > makeactive > > chainloader +1 > > > > This is my /etc/fstab: > > # <fs> <mountpoint> <type> <opts> > > <dump/pass> # NOTE: If your BOOT partition is ReiserFS, add the notail > > option to opts. /dev/sda14 /boot ext4 > > defaults,noatime 1 2 /dev/sda10 / > > ext4 noatime 0 1 /dev/sda11 > > /usr ext4 noatime 0 0 /dev/sda12 > > /var ext4 noatime 0 > > 0 /dev/sda13 /home ext4 noatime > > 0 0 /dev/sda9 none swap > > sw 0 0 /dev/cdrom /mnt/cdrom > > auto noauto,user 0 0 /dev/sda1 > > /media/win7 ntfs-3g rw,users,umask=000 0 0 /dev/sda5 > > /media/music ntfs-3g rw,users,umask=000 0 0 > > /dev/sda6 /media/animation ntfs-3g > > rw,users,umask=000 0 0 /dev/sda7 /media/data > > ntfs-3g rw,users,umask=000 0 0 /dev/sda8 > > /media/video ntfs-3g rw,users,umask=000 0 0 > > > > Thank you very much for your help! > > I see several problems from your grub and fstab config files: > > 1. If you have a separate /boot partition, you should have something like > > kernel (hd0,14)/kernel-3.2.1-gentoo-r2 root=/dev/sda10 splash quiet > video=radeon:1366x768 > initrd (hd0,14)/initramfs-3.2.1-gentoo-r2.img > in your grub.cfg.
Grub starts counting at "0", not at "1". So the partition is marked as (hd0,13) The /boot partition has a symlink called boot pointing back to itself. (hd0,13)/boot = (hd0,13) When specifying " root (hd0,13) " Grub will default to that partition. Eg. the grub config matches fstab. > 2. GRUB cannot read ext4 partitions (GRUB2 can), so you are reading > them as ext3 (I don't know if this can cause any problems). The reason > I started to use GRUB2 was because I wanted to use ext4 for my /. I don't think ext4 and ext3 use the same disk layout, eg. I don't think that can work. > 3. Where is the rd.debug command line? Without it, we can't see > dracut's debug messages. > > Delete /boot/initramfs*, and recreate the initramfs again, add the > rd.debug kernel command line in grub.cfg, and reboot again. The dmesg > output should have a lot of lines with "dracut:"; send that to the > list. Why start with deleting the initramfs? Why not create a new one with a new name and keep the old one for comparison later? -- Joost
