On Tuesday 03 April 2012 18.09:26 walt wrote: > This is an ~amd64 machine, up to date as of today. The strange thing > is that lvm did *not* fail to start -- it's working perfectly. > > Now, being an Incorrigible Old Fart(TM) I'm still using openrc, and > who knows what evil lurks in that paleolithic package? :p > > Anyone else getting this (false) alarm during boot? I have a similar thing on my ~x86, but the difference is that I know why I get it. I have successfully be able to create an initramfs that does a vgscan, vgchange -a y and mounts /usr (which is on LVM). But now I (naturally) I get "LVM failed to start" (and of cause "failed to mount /usr) when openrc processes the init-scripts. So, my question is really - should I remove lvm from the init-process and put noauto in /etc/fstab for /usr? Even if it is on my playground box I still want to be able to boot it. When these two "issues" are solved I'm going to let my system update udev.
-- Dan Johansson, <http://www.dmj.nu> *************************************************** This message is printed on 100% recycled electrons! ***************************************************
